Hardened HCI hypervisor
for the European Union
97.24% of hardening rules passing, publicly verifiable.
Built on SUSE Virtualization and the Harvester project.
Aligned with GDPR, NIS2, RGS.
150/156 evaluated
validated (PASS)
applied at build time
Results
validated (PASS)
analyzed and documented
tailoring exceptions
applied at build time
A verifiable score, not a marketing figure
The figure we communicate, 97.24%, is exactly the score shown at the top of the attached OpenSCAP report. Nothing is adjusted: replay the scan with oscap and you get the same number. Of 156 applicable rules, 150 pass.
OpenSCAP score: 97.24%. Full report below, replayable with oscap.
Positioning vs. competition
| Product | Score | Scan report published | Context | MAC / SELinux |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardpipe | 97,24 % | ✓ public HTML, replayable with oscap | EU (GDPR / NIS2 / RGS) | SELinux permissive (policies loaded, full audit) |
| VMware vSphere | 95 % | ✗ hardening checklist public, vendor scan report not published | US / DoD | Proprietary hypervisor, no SELinux |
| Nutanix AHV | 90 % | ✗ hardening checklist public, vendor scan report not published | US / Gov Cloud | Rocky Linux 8 base (community RHEL rebuild, AOS ≥ 6.8) / CentOS 7 legacy, SELinux permissive by default |
| Proxmox VE | - | ✗ no compliance claimed | EU (Austria, community) | Debian base, optional AppArmor |
Methodology note: the hardening checklists for Nutanix Acropolis (NCP #1325, 03/2026) and VMware vSphere are public. Those are the rule sets. Neither Nutanix nor VMware, however, publishes a scan report against that baseline: their marketing scores (90%, 95%) are not auditable. Hardpipe publishes the full HTML OpenSCAP report, rule by rule, replayable with oscap.
SELinux note: like VMware (no SELinux) and Nutanix AHV (permissive by default), Hardpipe runs SELinux in permissive mode. Policies are loaded; all violations are audited in /var/log/audit. Full enforcing on the KubeVirt/Longhorn stack is ongoing pioneering upstream work (no vendor offers it today).
Underlying OS: enterprise vs community. According to Nutanix's official KB (KB-16977), AOS and Prism Central before version 6.8 run on CentOS 7 (EOL June 30, 2024); AOS 6.8+, AOS 6.10 LTS and PC 2024.1+ migrate to Rocky Linux 8. Both are community rebuilds of RHEL, no vendor support contract on the OS itself. Hardpipe, by contrast, runs on SL Micro 6.2, a SUSE enterprise distribution (European vendor) with commercial support available.
Technical stack
slmicro62_hardened + AIDE + auditdWhy Hardpipe
Native EU context
Zero US-DoD references. Banners, documentation and regulatory mapping aligned with GDPR, NIS2, RGS. No dependency on a non-European vendor for hardening.
Verifiable, not announced
Our 97.24% is reproducible by any auditor with oscap. The full HTML report is available for inspection, no "trust us". Competitor de durcissements (Nutanix, VMware) publish the checklist, but no vendor scan report is publicly released for these products.
Reproducible, not opaque
Built via Dapper (upstream Harvester), hardening via hardening/files/ layer. Open-source hardening code, no proprietary binary blob.
Documented, not magical
Every tailoring exception is justified (stig-exceptions.md). Every residual FAIL is analyzed. No rule is disabled without technical reason.
Audit evidence
The full OpenSCAP report, generated by upstream oscap, is available online:
Access to the evaluation ISO image is provided on request: contact@rgeu.eu.
Documentation
Target audience
- Public sector : RGS enhanced level
- Healthcare : HDS + GDPR compliance
- Critical industry : NIS2
- European hosters : sovereignty